3月2日凌晨，豆瓣旗下自营文创平台豆瓣市集（豆瓣豆品）因优惠券系统设置错误，出现“满200减200”的异常优惠，引发全网“薅羊毛”热潮，平台商品库存被大量清空。此次漏洞源于平台妇女节促销活动设置失误，原计划推出“满200减20”优惠，却被错配为“满200减200”优惠券。用户下单满200元即可全额减免，仅需支付10元运费，部分订单实付金额低至17元，即可购得原价247元的商品组合。
2026-03-01 00:00:00:03014282710http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pc/content/202603/01/content_30142827.htmlhttp://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pad/content/202603/01/content_30142827.html11921 广告
，详情可参考51吃瓜
分析：伊朗政權架構仍在運作，未來幾天將顯示它是否能夠撐下去
The semantics around releasing locks with pending reads were also unclear for years. If you called read() but didn't await it, then called releaseLock(), what happened? The spec was recently clarified to cancel pending reads on lock release — but implementations varied, and code that relied on the previous unspecified behavior can break.
Claude reads them too. I tell Claude: